Soil Applied Zinc Ensures High Wheat Production

Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences (JEAS). Nawaz et al., 2015. Volume 2: 1

Open Access – Research Article

Soil Applied Zinc Ensures High Production and Net Returns of Divergent Wheat Cultivars
Hamid Nawaz1, Nazim Hussain1, Azra Yasmeen1, Muhammad Arif1, Mubashir Hussain1,
Muhammad Ishaq Asif Rehmani2,Muhammad Bilal Chattha3 and Ayaz Ahmad1
1Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences and Technology, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, Pakistan
2Department of Agronomy, Faculty of Agricultural Sciences, Ghazi University, Dera Ghazi Khan, Pakistan
3Institute of Agricultural Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore Pakistan


Abstract: Zinc (Zn) scarcity in soil is an important obstacle in achieving maximum wheat grain yield in calcareous soils. This can be overcome through Zn application appropriate either in the soil or foliage. A field study was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan (Pakistan) during Rabi 2010-11 to evaluate the role of soil applied Zn fertilizer on the growth and yield of divergent wheat cultivars. Wheat cultivars viz. Bakhar-2002, Shafaq-2006, Saher-2006, Faisalabad-2008 and Lasani-2008 were grown with Zn applications at the rate of 0, 4, 8 and 12 kg ha-1.Soil applied Zn at all levels significantly improved the maximum yield related traits of all wheat cultivars as compared with control. Though all the Zn levels excelled compared with control; however, the plots receiving Zn at 8 and12 kg ha-1 observed higher wheat output along with higher grain Zn contents. Wheat cultivars, Lasani-2008 and Saher-2006 out yielded all other wheat cultivars under study due to significant expansion in yield related traits. Moreover economic analysis disclosed that Lasani-2008 sown with 8 kg ha-1 of Zn observed the highest net income and benefit: cost ratio compared with all otherzinc levels. In order to get higher production and net returns, wheat cultivar Lasani-2008 should be grown with 8 kg ha-1 of Zn under arid conditions of Multan, Pakistan.

Keywords: Benefit cost ratio, micronutrient, soil fertilization, Triticum aestivum L., Zinc.

*Corresponding authors: Nazim Hussain, nazimhussain@bzu.edu.pk; Hamid Nawaz hamybhatti@gmail.com


Cite this article as:
Nawaz, H., N. Hussain, A. Yasmeen, M. Arif, M. Hussain, M.I.A. Rehmani, M.B. Chattha, A. Ahmad. 2015. Soil Applied Zinc Ensures High Production and Net Returns of Divergent Wheat Cultivars. Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sciences. 2:1. [View Full-Text] [Citations]


Copyright © Nawaz et al., 2015. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original author and source are appropriately cited and credited.


1. Introduction
In Pakistan wheat is cultivated on an area of 8.66 million hectares with an average yield of 2.69 t ha-1 (USDA, 2012). This average yield is tremendously lower than the yields realized in other countries of the world. Out of various factors responsible for its low yield, planting geometry, cultivars, weeds and inputs like irrigation and fertilizers have an effective role in increasing the yield of crops (Bakhtet al., 2007; Hussain et al., 2014; Nagarathnaet al., 2007).

Optimum plant nourishment is one of the most imperative factors in improving the quality and quantity of plants produce. Among all the plant nutrients, zinc (Zn) is one of the essential micronutrients vital for optimum crop growth (Sommer and Lipman, 1996; Shaheenet al., 2007; Rana and Kashif, 2014) and is required in small concentrations to permit numerous key plant physiological pathways to function normally (Alloway, 2002; Mousaviet al., 2011; Yosefiet al., 2011). It plays an important role in maintaining the integrity of biological membranes, the resistance to contagion by certain pathogens (Alloway, 2008) and the pollination by impact on pollen tube formation (Marschner, 1995; Outten and O’Halloran, 2001; Pandey et al., 2006). It is also required in the carbonic enzyme which presents in all photosynthetic tissues and for chlorophyll biosynthesis (Graham et al., 2000; Ali et al., 2008; Xi-Wen et al., 2011). Zinc deficient soils decreased the activity of these enzymes, in consequential carbohydrate accumulated in plants leaves (Marschner and Cakmak, 1989; Taheriet al., 2011), metabolism of plant hormones such as auxin (IAA) and tryptophan decreases, which ultimately stops leaf growth.

However, higher concentrations of Zn cause toxicity in plants. With phytotoxicity intensifying, reduced growth and yields (Broadleyet al., 2007), primarily due to the alteration in various physiological processes such as photosynthesis and photosynthetic electron transport, transpiration, biosynthesis of chlorophyll and cell membrane integrity (Millan-Lopez et al., 2005; Jayakumar and Jaleel, 2009; Hussain et al.,2010). In addition, large amount of Zn reduces the uptake of phosphorus and iron (Vitoshet al., 1994; Prasdet al., 1999).

In view of the aforementioned discussion, this field study was designed to appraise the optimum level of soil applied Zn fertilizer in promoting the productivity and net returns of divergent wheat cultivars.


2. Material and Methods
This study was conducted at Agronomic Research Area, Bahauddin Zakariya University, Multan, during the Rabi season 2012-2013. Five wheat cultivars viz. Bhakar-2002, Shafaq-2006, Saher-2006, Faisalabad-2008 and Lasani-2008 were grown under four levels of soil applied Zn viz. 0,4, 8 and 12 kg ha-1. The experiment was laid out in randomize complete block design (RCBD) with split plot arrangement by keeping Zn levels in main plots and wheat cultivars in sub plots. The experiment was replicated thrice with net plot size of 5 m × 1.8 m. A composite sample to a depth of 30 cm was obtained from the experimental area prior to sowing of crop and analyzed for its properties as described by Homer and Pratt (1961) (Table 1).

The seedbed was prepared by cultivating the field twice by tractor mounted cultivator followed by planking at suitable moisture contents. The sowing was done by hand drill keeping the seed rate of 125 kg ha-1 on November 11,2010 on well prepared seedbed by keeping row to row distance of 20 cm. Nitrogen (N) and phosphorus (P) fertilizers were applied at the rate of 200 and 150 kg ha-1, respectively by using urea and triple super-phosphate as a fertilizer source. Whole P and half of N were applied at the time of sowing and remaining N was applied with 1st irrigation. Soil moisture was kept at satisfactory levels to put off water deficit and wilting. Weeds were restricted by hand weeding as required. All other agronomic practices were kept constant to keep the crop free from insect and diseases.  At maturity, crop was harvested on April 14, 2013.

Table 1: Mechanical and chemical soil characteristics at the experimental sites during the growing season
soil characteristics at the experimental sites during the growing season

A unit area of 1 m2 was selected at random from two different sites from each plot and total number of productive tillers were counted and averaged. Twenty random selected tillers were used to record plant height, spike length, number of spikelets per spike and number of grains per spike. Three random selected samples of 1000 grains were counted and weighed on an electrical balance and averaged to record 1000-grain weight. At maturity each plot was harvested manually, sun dried for a week, tied into bundles and weighed for getting biological yield. After recording biological yield, the bundles were threshed manually and the grains were weighed to record grain yield. The yields (biological and grain) from the harvested areas were converted into kg ha-1 by unitary method. Harvest index (HI) was taken as ratio of grain yield to biological yield expressed in percentage. Zinc contents in grains were measured by digesting the known weight of a sample in a ternary acid mixture and reading the element on PyeUnicum Sp-2900 Atomic Absorption Spectrophotometer (Philippines)(Yashidaet al., 1976).

All the collected data were analyzed statistically using the Fisher’s analysis of variance technique and Duncan’s multiple range test (DMR) at 5% probability level was used to compare significance of treatment means (Steel et al., 1997). For economic analysis, total expenses incurred on wheat production from sowing to harvesting were computed. The expenses included the price of land rent, seedbed preparation, seed sowing, fertilizers, irrigations and plant protection measures. Further, gross income was estimated by considering the current prices of the wheat grains and straw. Net income was figured by subtracting expenses from gross income while benefit: cost ratio (BCR) was computed by dividing gross income with total expenses incurred (Shah et al., 2006).


3. Results
Interactive effect of wheat cultivars and soil applied Zn levels had significant  on entire yield related traits, so only the results regarding interaction between wheat cultivars and Zn levels are presented below.

Soil applied Zn significantly improved the plant height and number of productive tillers of all wheat cultivars compared with control (Table 2).

Table 2: Effect of soil applied Zn on plant height and yield components of different wheat cultivars

 

Here Zn1, Zn2, Zn3 and Zn4 represents 0, 4, 8 and12 kg ha-1 of Zn; and V1, V2, V3, V4 and V5 represents Bhakar-2002, Shafaq-2006, Saher-2006, Faisalabad-2008 and Lasani-2008, respectively. Means not sharing the same letter within a column differ significantly from each other at 5% of probability level.

Maximum plant height and number of productive tillers were noted in wheat cultivar Lasani-2008 sown under 8 and 12 kg ha-1 of Zn but it was at par with Sehar-2006 sown under 12 kg ha-1 of Zn only for plant height. While minimum plant height and number of productive tillers were observed in Bakhar 2002 and Shafaq-2006 under control (Table 2). Likewise, all levels of soil applied Zn improved the number of spikelets per spike and number of grains per spike of all wheat cultivars compared with control (Table 2).

Maximum number of spikelets per spike and number of grains per spike were noted in wheat cultivar Lasani 2008 sown under 12 kg ha-1 of Zn while minimum number of spikelets per spike and number of grains per spike were observed in Bakhar-2002, Shafaq-2006 and Faisalabad grown without Zn application (Table 2). However with respect to 1000-grain weight, Sehar-2006 under 12 kg ha-1 and Faisalabad 2008 under 8 and 12 kg ha-1 of Zn application recorded higher 1000-grain weight while all the cultivars under control recorded the minimum 1000-grain weight (Table 2).

Table 3: Effect of soil applied Zn on grain and biological yield, harvest index and grain zinc contents of different wheat cultivars
Effect of soil applied Zn on grain and biological yield, harvest index and grain zinc contents
Here Zn1, Zn2, Zn3 and Zn4 represents 0, 4, 8 and12 kg ha-1 of Zn; and V1, V2, V3, V4 and V5 represents Bhakar 2002, Shafaq 2006, Saher 2006, Faisalabad 2008 and Lasani 2008, respectively. Means not sharing the same letter within a column differ significantly from each other at 5% of probability level.

Zinc application at all levels, 8 and 12 kg ha-1 were the best, improved the grain and biological yield of all tested wheat cultivars than control (Table 3). Wheat cultivar Lasani 2006 with 12 kg ha-1 of Zn observed the higher biological yield while all the tested cultivars observed minimum biological yield under control conditions (Table 3). Wheat cultivar Lasani 2006 with 8 and 12 kg ha-1 of Zn and Sehar 2006 with 8 kg ha-1 of Zn observed the higher grain yield while all the tested cultivars observed minimum grain yield under control conditions (Table 3). However all the tested cultivars observed higher harvest index under 4 and 8 kg ha-1 of Zn application compared with control and higher level of Zn application (Table 3). Moreover, Sehar 2006 under 8 and 12 kg ha-1 of Zn application observed higher grain Zn contents but all the tested cultivars noted minimum Zn grain contents under control (Table 3).

Table 4: Effect of soil applied Zn on net income and benefit: cost ratio (BCR) of different wheat cultivars
Effect of soil applied Zn on net income and benefit: cost ratio
Note: 1 US$ = 110 Pakistan Rs. Here Zn1, Zn2, Zn3 and Zn4 represents 0, 4, 8 and12 kg ha-1 of Zn; and V1, V2, V3, V4 and V5 represents Bhakar 2002, Shafaq 2006, Saher 2006, Faisalabad 2008 and Lasani 2008, respectively

All Zn levels substantially improved the gross and net income, and benefit: cost ratio (BCR) of all tested wheat cultivars compared with control i.e. without Zn application (Table 4). Nonetheless wheat cultivar Lasani-2006 observed maximum net income tied with accelerated BCR sown under 8 and 12 kg ha-1 of Zn application whereas all the cultivars recorded lesser net income and BCR when sown without Zn application (Table 4).


4. Discussion
Balanced use of fertilizer is one of the most important factor in enhancing the quality and quantity of crops product. The importance of trace elements in maintaining optimum plant physiology is becoming eminent. Among all of these elements, Zn is famous to have an effective character either as a metal component of enzymes or as a structural, functional or regulatory co-factor of numerous enzymes (Grotz and Guerinot, 2006). Plant height is one of the main vegetative growth parameter of wheat plant which represents the genetic variation and fertilizer effect. The increase in plant height might be due to the involvement of Zn in different physiological process like enzyme activation (Yassenet al., 2010), stomatal regulation (Oosterhuits and Weir, 2010) and chlorophyll formation (Habib, 2009) etc., which ultimately increase the plant height (Yaseenet al., 2011).

Results of this field study disclosed that increasing rate of Zn application improved the yield and related traits of all wheat cultivars under study (Tables 2, 3). Abbas et al. (2009) also observed the improved wheat growth and yield with the application of zinc fertilizer.

Significant expansion in yield related traits like number of productive tillers, spikelets per spike, grains per spike and 1000-grain weight was the cause of accelerated yield of tested wheat cultivars with Zn application (Table 2). It might be due to the involvement of Zn in physiological processes like enzyme activation and chlorophyll formation (Bailey et al., 2002; Hansch and Mendel, 2009) and genetic variation among different wheat cultivars (Sattaret al., 2010). Similar results were reported by Rahimiet al. (2012) who observed that application of zinc fertilizer improved the number of tillers of wheat

 Divergent wheat cultivars behaved differently due to their different genetic makeup; and Lasani 2006 out yielded other cultivars under 8 and 12 kg ha-1 of Zn application. It might be due to its better genetic makeup and contribution of Zn in enzyme activation (Yassenet al., 2010), chlorophyll biosynthesis (Cakmak, 2008), pollen tube formation and pollen viability (Pandey et al., 2006), starch utilization (Habib, 2009), ensuing in greater seed set. Many researchers has reported the same findings in wheat (Narimaniet al., 2010; Abbas et al., 2011;Nadimet al., 2012). Micronutrients including Zn application plays a vital role in a variety of physiological and biochemical processes (Reeves and Baker, 2000; Donchevaet al., 2001; Stoyanova and Doncheva, 2002; Di Baccioet al., 2005; Broadleyet al., 2007), culminating in more dry matter and grain yield production in cereals (Khan et al., 2010; Hussain et al., 2012; Sharma et al., 2014).

Progressive increase in Zn grain contents might be due to higher soil Zn contents due to external soil Zn application compared with control. Moreover different Zn grain contents in divergent wheat cultivars under control and varying levels of Zn application indicated the relative acquisition efficiencies of these genotypes from a Zn deficient and fertilized soil. Efficient genotypes such as Bhakar 2002 and Lasani-2008 accumulated more Zn contents in grains (Maqsoodet al., 2009).

Economic feasibility in monetary terms seemed the reliable tool in determining the commercial adoption of any new innovation at farmer’s head (Khan et al., 2012). Findings of this study disclosed the economic feasibility of Zn application over control with higher economic returns and BCR of all tested wheat cultivars (Table 4). The supremacy in terms of higher BCR is the direct result of improvement of yield and related traits with Zn application at the rate of 8 kg ha-1and 12 kg ha-1.


5. Conclusion
The negative effect of Zn deficiency in calcareous soil causes in reduction of wheat crop yield. So, horizontal approaches like in present study, soil applied Zn can be used which significantly improved the production and net returns of all wheat cultivars compared with control. However, to get high production and net returns, wheat cultivar Lasani 2008 should be grown with 8 kg ha-1 of Zn under arid conditions of Multan, Pakistan.


Acknowledgments: The authors are grateful to the colleagues at Department of Agronomy, B.Z.U. Multan for their help in conducting the experiment and subsequent analysis.

Competing Interests: Authors declare that they have no competing interests.


References
Abbas, G., M.Q. Khan, M. Jamil, M. Tahir and F. Hussain. 2009. Nutrient uptake, growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivum) as affected by zinc application rates. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 11: 389–39.

Abbas, G., M.Q. Khan, M.J. Khan, M. Tahir, M. Ishaque and F. Hussain. 2011. Nutrient uptake, growth and yield of wheat (Triticum aestivumL.) as affected by manganese application. Pak. J. Bot. 43: 607–616.

Ali, S., K.A. Riaz, G. Mairaj, M. Arif, M. Fida, S. Bibi. 2008. Assessment of different crop nutrient management practices for yield improvement. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 2: 150–157.

Alloway, B.J. 2002. Zinc-the vital micronutrient for healthy, high-value crops. International Zinc Association (IZA), Belgium.

Alloway, B.J. 2008. Zinc in soils and crop nutrition. Second edition, published by IZA and IFA, Brussels, Belgium, Paris and France.

Bailey, S., E. Thompson, P.J. Nixon, P. Horton, C.W. Mullineaux, C. Robinson and N.H. Mann. 2002. A critical role for the Var2 FtsH homologue of Arabidopsis thaliana in the photosystem II repair cycle in vivo. J. Biol. Chem. 277: 2006–2011.

Bakht, J., Z. Qamer, M. Shafi, H. Akber, M.U. Rahman, N. Ahmad and M.J. Khan. 2007. Response of different wheat varieties to various row spacing. Sarhad J. Agric. 23: 839–845.

Broadley, M.R., P.J. White, J.P. Hammond, I. Zelko and A. Lux. 2007. Zinc in plants. New Phytol. 173:677–702.

Cakmak, I. 2008. Enrichment of cereal grains with zinc: Agronomic or genetic biofortification? Plant Soil.302:1–17.

Di Baccio, D., R. Tognetti, L. Sebastiani and C. Vitagliano. 2003. Responses of Populusdeltoidesx Populusnigra(Populusx euramericana) clone I-214 to high zinc concentrations. New Phytol. 159: 443–452.

Doncheva, S., Z. Stoyanova and V. Velikova. 2001. Influence of succinate on zinc toxicity of pea plants. J. Plant Nutr. 24: 789–804.

Government of Pakistan. 2012. Agricultural Statistics of Pakistan, 2011-12. Ministry of Food, Agriculture and Livestock, Economic Wing, Islamabad, Pakistan.

Graham, R.D., R.M. Welch and H.E. Bouis. 2000. Addressing micronutrient nutrition through enhancing the nutritional quality of staple foods. Adv. Agron. 70: 77–161.

Grotz, N. and M.L. Guerinot. 2006. Molecular aspects of Cu, Fe and Zn homeostasis in plants. Biochem. Biophys. Acta. 17: 595–608.

Guarda, G., S. Padovan and G. Delogu. 2004. Grain yield, nitrogen use efficiency and baking quality of old and modern Italian bread wheat cultivars grown at different nitrogen levels. Eur. J. Agron. 21: 181–192.

Habib, M. 2009. Effect of foliar application of Zn and Fe on wheat yield and quality. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 8: 6795–6798.

Hansch, R. and R.R. Mendel. 2009. Physiological functions of mineral micronutrients (Cu, Zn, Mn, Fe,Ni, Mo,B, Cl). Curr. Opin. Plant. Biol. 12: 259–266.

Homer, D. C. and P. F. Partt. 1961. Methods of analysis of soils, plants and waters. Univ. of California, Div. Agric. Sci., USA, pp. 150–196.

Hussain N., A. Yasmeen, M. Arif and H. Nawaz. 2014. Exploring the role of row spacing in yield improvement of wheat cultivars. Pak. J. Agric. Sci.51, 25-31.

Hussain, K., K.K. Sahadevan and N. Salim. 2010. Bioaccumulation and release of mercury in Vignamungo(L.) Hepper seedlings. J. Stress Physiol. Biochem., 6: 56–63.

Hussain, M., M.A. Khan, M.B. Khan, M. Farooq and S. Farooq.2012. Boron application improves the growth, yield and net economic return of rice. Rice Sci.,19:259−262.

Jayakumar, K. and C.H. Jaleel. 2009. Uptake and accumulation of cobalt in plants: a study based on exogenous cobalt in soybeans. Bot. Res. Int., 2: 310- 314.

Khan, M.B., M. Farooq, M. Hussain, Shahnawaz and G. Shabir. 2010. Foliar application of micronutrients improves the wheat yield and net Economic return. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 12: 953–956.

Khan, M.B., M. Khan, M. Hussain, M. Farooq, K. Jabran and D.J. Lee. 2012. Bio-economic assessment of different wheat-canola intercropping systems. Int. J. Agric. Biol., 14: 769–774.

Maqsood, M.A., Rahmatullah, S. Kanwal, T. Aziz and M. Ashraf. 2009. Evaluation of Zn distribution among grain and straw of twelve indigenous wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) genotypes. Pak. J. Bot., 41: 225–231.

Marschner, H. 1995. Mineral nutrition of high plant, Academic Press, 330–355.

Marschner, H. and J. Cakmak. 1989. High light intensity enhances chlorosis and necrosis in leaves of zinc, potassium, and magnesium deficient bean (Phasseolus vulgaris) plants. J. Plant Physiol. 134: 924–934.

Millan, A.F., D. R. Ellis and M. A. Grusak. 2005. Effect of zinc and manganese supply on the activities of superoxide dismutase and carbonic anhydrase in Medicagotruncatulawild type and razmutant plants. Plant Sci.168: 1015–1022.

Mousavi, S.R., M. Shahsavari and M. Rezaei. 2011. A general overview on manganese (Mn) importance for crops production. Aust. J. Basic App. Sci. 5: 1799–1803.

Nadim, M.A., I.U. Awan, M.S. Baloch, E.A. Khan, K. Naveed and M.A. Khan. 2012. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to different micronutrients and their application methods. J. Anim. Plant Sci. 22: 113–119.

Nagarathna, T.K., T.G. Prasad, D.J. Bagyaraj and Y.G. Shadakshari. 2007. Effect of arbuscular mycorrhiza and phosphorus levels on growth and water use efficiency in sunflower at different soil moisture status. J. Agric. Tech. 3: 221–229.

Narimani, H., M. M. Rahimi, A. Ahmadikhah and B. Vaezi. 2010. Study on the effects of foliar spray of micronutrient on yield and yield components of durum wheat. Arch. Appl. Sci. Res. 2: 168–176.

Oosterhuits, D.M. and B.L. Weir, 2010. Foliar fertilization of cotton. In: J. McD. Stewart at al. (Ed). Springer physiology of cotton Science + Busisness Media B.V. California, USA.

Outten, C.E. and T.V. O’Halloran. 2001. Femtomolar sensitivity of metalloregulatory protein controlling Zn homeostasis. Science. 292: 2488–2492.

Pandey, N., G.C. Pathak and C.P.  Sharma. 2006. Zinc is critically required for pollen function and fertilisation in lentil. J. Trace Elem. Med. Bio. 20: 89-96.

Prasd, K., P.P Saradhi and P. Sharmila. 1999. Concerted action of antioxidant enzymes and curtailed growth under zinc toxicity in Brassica juncea. Environ. Exp. Bot. 42: 1–10.

Rahimi, A., S. Rezaei, H. Nouri and A. Aghashiri. 2012. Effects of municipal wastewater and zinc fertilizer on yield and yield components of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) in the Yasouj region of Iran. Int. J. Agric. Sci. 2: 313–319.

Rana, W.K. and S.R. Kashif. 2014. Effect of different Zinc sources and methods of application on rice yield and nutrients concentration in rice grain and straw. J. Environ. Agric. Sci. 1:9.

Reeves, R. D. and J. M. Baker. 2000. Metalaccumulating plants. In: H. Raskin and B. D. Ensley (Eds.). pp. 193–230. Phytoremediation of Toxic Metals: Using Plants to Clean Up the Environment. John Wiley & Sons Inc., London.

Rueda A., V.P., J. Rasmussen, R. Gerhards and N.E. Fournaise. 2011. The influence of post-emergence weed harrowing on selectivity, crop recovery and crop yield in different growth stages of winter wheat. Weed Res. 51: 478–488.

Sattar, A., M.A. Cheema, M. Farooq, M.A. Wahid, A. Wahid and B.H. Babar. 2010. Evaluating the performance of wheat cultivars under late sown conditions. Int. J. Agric. Biol. 12: 561–565.

Shah, S.K.H., M. Aslam, P. Khan, M.Y. Memon, M. Imtiaz, S. Siddiqui and Nizamuddin. 2006. Effect of different methods and rates of phosphorus application in mungbean. Soil Environ. 25: 55‒58.

Shaheen, R., M.K. Samim and R. Mahmud. 2007. Effect of zinc on yield and zinc uptake by wheat on some soils of Bangladesh. J. Soil Nat. 1: 07–14.

Sharma, M., Y.K. Sharma and M.L. Dotaniya. 2014. Effect of Press Mud and FYM Application with Zinc Sulphate on Yield of Hybrid Rice. J. Environ. Agric. Sci. 1:8.

Sommer, A.L. and C.B. Lipman, 1996. Evidence on the indispensable nature of zinc and boron for higher green plant. Plant Physiol. 1: 231–249.

Steel, R.G.D., J.H. Torrie and D.A. Dickey. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics. McGraw Hill Book Co., Inc. New York, USA.

Stoyanova, Z. and S. Doncheva. 2002. The effect of zinc supply and succinate treatment on plant growth and mineral uptake in pea plant. Braz. J. Plant Physiol. 14: 111–116.

Taheri, N., H. Heidari, K. Yousefi and S.R. Mousavi. 2011. Effect of organic manure with phosphorus and zinc on yield of seed potato. Aust. J. Basic Appl. Sci. 5: 775–780.

USDA 2012.United States Department of Agriculture. Oferta e demandamundial de trigo. Available from: <http://www.fas.usda.gov/psdonline/psdQuery.aspx>.

Vitosh, M.L., D.D. Warncke and R.E. Lucas. 1994. Zinc determine of crop and soil. Michigan State University Extension.

Xi-Wen, Y., L. Xiao-Hong, T. Xin-Chun, G.J. William and C. Yu-Xian. 2011. Foliar zinc fertilization improves the zinc nutritional value of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) grain. Afr. J. Biotechnol. 10: 14778–14785.

Yaseen, M., W. Ahmed, M. Arshad and Q. Ali. 2011. Response of wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) to foliar feeding of micronutrients. Int. J. Agro Veterinary Medical Sci., 5: 209–220.

Yassen, A., E.A.A. Abou El-Nour and S. Shedeed. 2010. Response of wheat to foliar spray with urea and micronutrients. J. Am. Sci. 6: 14–22.

Yosefi, K., M. Galavi, M. Ramrodi and S.R. Mousavi. 2011. Effect of bio-phosphate and chemical phosphorus fertilizer accompanied with micronutrient foliar application on growth, yield and yield components of maize (Single Cross 704). Aust. J. Crop Sci. 5: 175–180.

Yoshida, S., D.A. Foano, J.H. Cock and K.A. Gomez. 1976. Laboratory manual for physiological studies of Rice. pp. 13-18. Ed. 3. The International Rice Research Institute, Philippines.


Similar Articles Published in JEAS

  • Ahmad, I., S.M.A. Basra, S. Hussain, S.A. Hussain, Hafeez-ur-Rehman, A. Rehman and A. Ali. 2015. Priming with ascorbic acid, salicylic acid and hydrogen peroxide improves seedling growth of spring maize at suboptimal temperature. Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sciences. 3:14-22.[View Full-Text] [Citations].
  • Sattar, S., M.M. Iqbal, A. Areeb, Z. Ahmed, M. Irfan, R.N. Shabbir, G. Aishia and S. Hussain. 2015. Genotypic variations in wheat for phenology and accumulative heat unit under different sowing times. Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sciences. 2:8. [View Full-Text] [Citations]

 

Subscribe to Get JEAS Updates

We’d love to keep you updated with our latest articles and news 😎

We don’t spam! Read our [link]privacy policy[/link] for more info.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *