Blue Rock Pigeon As An Indicator Of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons (PAH) Pollution: A Review

Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences (JEAS). Abubaker et al., 2025. 27(1&2):10-21

Open Access – Review Article

Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon (PAH) Pollution through Avian Sentinels: A Review of Blue Rock Pigeons
Muhammad Abubakar 1,*, Abdul Wahab 1, Muhammad Rafique Khan 1, Nabia Sarfraz 1, Zubda Maharavi 1

1 College of Earth and Environmental Sciences, University of the Punjab, Lahore, Pakistan


Abstract:

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are widespread environmental contaminants, known for their toxic and bioaccumulative effects on wildlife, particularly birds. These toxic compounds originate from anthropogenic and natural sources, leading to significant contamination risks. Various research methodologies, such as egg cell injection, yolk injection, eggshell application, and field studies involving controlled and uncontrolled groups at contaminated and reference sites, have been utilized to evaluate PAH contamination in avian species. However, existing studies predominantly focus on tracking short-term effects, often overlooking the long-term impacts and underlying mechanisms of PAH toxicity. Four to six-ring PAHs are particularly harmful, associated with adverse outcomes, including reduced body weight and fertility, enhanced organ development and metabolism, compromised immunity and survival rates, along with lower egg production and clutch size in birds. High incidences of reproductive disorders associated with PAHs have been documented in avian populations in the vicinity of human settlements or affected by oil spills in coastal and marine environments. Continuous exposure of PAHs is prevalent among bird populations. This review emphasizes the urgent need for a continuous monitoring program targeting PAHs and their metabolites across various bird species inhabiting both unaffected and polluted environments. Continued focus and further research into PAHs are crucial for understanding their long-term ecological impacts on avian health and biodiversity.

Keywords: Avian health, Bioindicator species, Bioaccumulation, Biomagnification, Ecological risk assessments, Ecotoxicology, Environmental monitoring, Environmental stressors, Reproductive disorders, Species sensitivity, Toxicokinetics, Wildlife pollution.
*Corresponding author:
Muhammad Abubakar, muhammadabubakar704@gmail.com 

Cite this article as:

Abubaker, M., A.W. Hussain, M.R. Khan and N. Sarfraz. 2025. Assessment of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbon Pollution through Avian Sentinels: A Review of Blue Rock Pigeons. Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sciences. 26 (1&2): 10-21 [View FullText] [Citations]. 


Copyright © Abubaker et al., 2025  This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original author and source are appropriately cited and credited.


Similar Articles Published in JEAS

  1. Jabeen, F., A. Aslam and M. Salman. 2020. Heavy metal contamination in vegetables and soil irrigated with sewage water and health risks assessment. Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences 22(1):23- 31. [Abstract] [View Full-Text] [Citations]

Competing Interest Statement: The authors have declared that they have no competing interests and there is no conflict of interest exists.


1. Introduction:

1.1. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) are organic compounds consisting of two or more interconnected aromatic (benzene) rings composed exclusively of carbon and hydrogen (Mallah et al., 2022; Tartaglione et al., 2023). These compounds can transform into hydroxyl, quinoid, and nitrated metabolites (Ma and Wu, 2024; Manousi et al., 2021). PAHs are commonly found in petroleum, tar, and coal, as well as produced through incomplete combustion of organic matter. Coal combustions, automobile engines, incinerators, biomass burning in forests, slash-and-burn agriculture, and smoking and cooking activities are among the major sources of PAH emissions (Chen et al., 2022; Wietzoreck et al., 2022; Wang et al., 2022).

PAHs are colorless or pale-yellow solids, that can be found in air, water, soil, plants, and animal tissues around the globe. Due to their diverse structures and bioaccumulative properties, PAHs exhibit varying degrees of toxicity and are persistent in the environment (Dey et al., 2023; Patel et al., 2020; Sahoo et al., 2020).

Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) enter ecosystems through various natural and anthropogenic pathways. Natural sources include forest and brush fires, while anthropogenic sources encompass automobile emissions, cigarette smoke, and industrial activities. Interest in PAHs as a potential cause of illness surged in 1918 when the carcinogenic properties of benzo(a)pyrene were first identified (Anifowose et al., 2020; Arienzo et al., 2024; Famiyeh et al., 2021). Since then, extensive research has revealed the carcinogenic, mutagenic, teratogenic, and tumorigenic effects of PAHs, particularly in fish and mammals (Honda and Suzuki, 2020; Yebra-Pimentel et al., 2015). This growing body of evidence highlights the urgent need to monitor PAH exposure and develop strategies to mitigate their harmful effects on ecosystems and public health (Ephraim-Emmanuel and Ordinioha, 2021; Sekar and Praveenkumar, 2024). Understanding the sources, behavior, and environmental fate of PAHs is essential for assessing their ecological impact and the risks they pose to both human health and wildlife.

1.2. Structure and Formation of PAH

PAHs are mainly formed through incomplete combustion of organic materials. This process also contributes to the generation of combustion-derived particles. Beyond their environmental impact, PAHs have significant roles in astrochemistry and materials science. These compounds are known carcinogens and persistent organic pollutants (Reizer et al., 2022).

A study investigates benzo(a)pyrene formation from chrysene and Benz (a)anthracene using a methyl addition/cyclization (MAC) mechanism. The study provides mechanistic insights into the chemical steps involved, including addition reactions, ring closures, hydrogen abstractions, and intramolecular hydrogen shifts. Results reveal that both reaction routes exhibit closely matched energetic trends, with an average energy difference of only 6.13 kJ/mol, highlighting the stability of the benzo(a)anthracene pathway (Almeida et al., 2012).

Heteroatoms and substituents on the ring system are absent from PAHs. Light PAHs are defined as those with less than four rings, and heavy PAHs are those with more rings (Eom et al., 2007). Heavy PAHs are more hazardous and stable than light PAHs. (Tkachenko et al., 2021).

PAHs are hydrocarbons ranging from naphthalene to coronene, i.e., two rings to seven rings, and chemically comprise two or more benzene rings fused into liner, cluster, or angular patterns with alternating single and double bonds. Phenanthrene and anthracene are the simplest PAHs due to their smaller structures, i.e., they consist of only 3 rings (Bartonitz et al., 2020). PAHs have been classified into small (with up to six fused aromatic rings) and large (with more than seven fused aromatic rings) PAHs. Benzo(a)pyrene and 7,12-dimethyl benzo anthracene are the most extensively analyzed and studied PAHs.

Sometimes true PAHs are considered by investigators with nitrogen, sulphur, or oxygen within the ring or substituted for bonded hydrogen. Most PAHs are formed by pyrolysis and subsequent synthesis of the organic matter (Pereira, 2014).

In the presence of high temperatures, i.e., 500-800 degrees Celsius, PAHs are formed because of incomplete combustion of organic matter, whereas in low temperatures, i.e., 100-300 degrees Celsius, by subjecting organic matter to sediments, PAHs production is observed in the form of coal and oil in sedimentary rocks, over a long period. (Zhang et al., 2015).

Although PAHs formed in both temperatures are identical, alkylated compounds formed at low temperatures are abundant.

1.3. Fundamental toxic nature

Cancer is the foremost genuine result of PAH harming. PAHs have a moo intense harmfulness. Based on PAH, a few considers have found noncarcinogenic impacts. After drawn out introduction, the non-carcinogenic impacts of PAHs to a great extent influence the pneumonic, gastrointestinal, renal, and dermatologic frameworks. Numerous PAHs are either humbly mutagenic or non-mutagenic in vitro; in any case, their metabolites or subsidiaries can be solid mutagens (Kobetičová et al., 2008).

1.4. Routes of exposure for polycyclic aromatic compounds

Most people endure exposure to PAHs daily through the air, water, soil, and food. Exposure modalities include intake, inhalation, and skin contact in both occupational and non-occupational circumstances (Pereira et al., 2009). Various exposures, such as cutaneous and inhalation exposures from polluted air, may include numerous routes at the same time, which impacts the total absorbed dose. All non-workplace sources of exposure should be evaluated, including food, smoking, and coal and wood combustion (Dhananjayan, 2013).

1.5. Bioaccumulation of PAH in living organisms

PAHs have the ability to be absorbed and stored by living beings due to their lipophilicity. Several investigations have demonstrated that PAHs can accumulate in rodents, pigs, cows, and human adipose tissue (Luzardo et al., 2014).

Immunotoxicity, embryonic abnormalities, and cardiotoxicity in aquatic life. Tumours, reproduction, development, and immunity in birds. Skin, lung, bladder, liver, and stomach cancers are more common in animals, as are injection-site sarcomas. Skin, lung, bladder, and gastrointestinal malignancies are more common in humans (Power et al., 2021).

2. Significance of birds concerning ecology and environmental pollution

Birds are a big and diverse group of species that play many important ecological roles and offer a multitude of ecosystem services. As intermediaries between apex predators and nutrients, they actively participate in the trophic transfer of pollutants (Brausch et al., 2010).

Birds maintain plant diversity and growth and also perform important ecological roles as pollinators and seed dispersers. Several birds can function as ecosystem engineers in some habitats (e.g., Little Auk, Black-backed Woodpeckers, and vultures of the Accipitridae and Bucerotidae families) or are keystone species. Birds have cultural significance and have represented countries and groups (Franci et al., 2018).

Sadly, reports of avian population decrease and extinctions in North America and other parts of the world have been linked to habitat degradation, unrestricted harvesting, and human causes of mortality. When it comes to chemical modeling, risk assessment, environmental benchmarking, and the management of chemical pollutants, birds are a significant class of vertebrates to take into account. In the past, it has been documented those birds are among the species that experience negative effects from pollution. (Ball and Truskewycz, 2013).

During the 1850s industrial revolution, reports of manmade environmental pollutants harming birds and other species started to mount. These reports included cases of hydrogen sulfide fumes near oil fields, industrial smokestack emission toxicity, and arsenic and lead poisoning. Birds have long been utilized as sentinel species because of their great chemical sensitivity, which makes them effective bioindicators of environmental contamination (Ball and Truskewycz, 2013).

Fowls are in a perfect world suited to comprehend and evaluate the ultimate destiny and ecotoxicological results of natural compounds in differing settings since they are plenteous pinnacle predators in a assortment of environments. They can help within the progression of comparable investigation in other vertebrates. Because of their tall trophic position, long life expectancy, and huge scavenging territories that permit for spatiotemporal introduction and ecotoxicological destiny evaluations of pertinent chemicals, winged creatures of prey are frequently utilized as sentinels for natural contamination. Fowls have generally been uncovered to a wide run of toxins. One of the foremost well-known cases is the enormous worldwide decrease in raptor populaces caused by eggshell diminishing after presentation to dichloro-diphenyl-trichloroethane (DDT). Intense inebriation from poisons regularly appears like a less strong and quick danger, but extreme indirect toxic impacts, basically agrochemicals, on farmland fowls are depicted as drivers of population decline (Bartonitz et al., 2020).

Other threats at the population level associated with chemical exposure have been reported for avian taxa, such as global lead poisonings of raptor and waterbird species. Nevertheless, as of right now, no comprehensive long-term survey has been conducted on birds, either individually or in populations, to evaluate the short- or long-term impacts of the several chemicals or chemical mixes.


2. Fundamental toxic nature 


References

Albers, P.H. and T.R. Loughlin. 2003. Effects of PAHs on Marine Birds, Mammals and Reptiles, PAHs: An Ecotoxicological Perspective, p. 243-261. https://doi.org/10.1002/0470867132.ch13

Almeida, J. R., C. Gravato, and L. Guilhermino. 2012. Challenges in assessing the toxic effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons to marine organisms: a case study on the acute toxicity of pyrene to the European seabass (Dicentrarchus labrax L.). Chemosphere 86 (9):926-937. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2011.10.059

Alonso-Alvarez, C., I. Munilla, M. López-Alonso, and A. Velando. 2007. Sublethal toxicity of the Prestige oil spill on yellow-legged gulls. Environ. Int. 33 (6):773-781. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envint.2007.02.012

Anifowose, A.J., A.O. Ogundola, B.M. Babalola and S.H. Awojide. 2020. Measurement, source-profiling and potential toxicity of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in an agrarian soil. Environ. Process. 7: 827-844. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40710-020-00446-3

Arienzo, M., M. Toscanesi, L. Ferrara, C. Donadio, P. Mondal, J.M. Ponniah, G. Napolitano, S. Kumar Sarkar and M. Trifuoggi. 2024. First results of a campaign of the measurement of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in the sediments of the Hooghly river, West Bengal, India. J. Mar. Sci. Eng. 12: 666. https://doi.org/10.3390/jmse12040666

Bartonitz, A., I. N. Anyanwu, J. Geist, H. K. Imhof, J. Reichel, J. Graßmann, J. E. Drewes, and S. Beggel. 2020. Modulation of PAH toxicity on the freshwater organism G. roeseli by microparticles. Environ. Pollut. 260:113999. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envpol.2020.113999

Burkhard, L.P. 2021. Evaluation of published bioconcentration factor (BCF) and bioaccumulation factor (BAF) data for per- and polyfluoroalkyl substances across aquatic species. Environ. Toxicol. Chem. 40: 1530-1543. https://doi.org/10.1002/etc.5010

Chen, Y.-P., Y. Zeng, Y.-F. Guan, Y.-Q. Huang, Z. Liu, K. Xiang, Y.-X. Sun and S.-J. Chen. 2022. Particle size-resolved emission characteristics of complex polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH) mixtures from various combustion sources. Environ. Res. 214: 113840. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envres.2022.113840

Dey, S., T. Mondal and P. Samanta. 2023. Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Sources, Distribution, and Health Impacts in Aquatic Vertebrates. In: R. Singh, P. Singh, S. Tripathi, K. K. Chandra and R. Bhadouria, editors, Xenobiotics in Urban Ecosystems: Sources, Distribution and Health Impacts. Springer International Publishing, Cham. p. 185-208. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-35775-6_9

Dhananjayan, V. 2013. Accumulation pattern and distribution of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in liver tissues of seven species of birds from Ahmedabad, India, during 2005–2007. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 20: 3414-3422. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-012-1282-5

Eom, I., C. Rast, A. Veber, and P. Vasseur. 2007. Ecotoxicity of a polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon (PAH)-contaminated soil. Ecotoxicol. Environ. Saf. 67 (2):190-205. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoenv.2006.12.020 

Ephraim-Emmanuel, B.C. and B. Ordinioha. 2021. Exposure and public health effects of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon compounds in Sub-Saharan Africa: A systematic review. Int. J. Toxicol. 40: 250-269. https://doi.org/10.1177/10915818211002487

Famiyeh, L., K. Chen, J. Xu, Y. Sun, Q. Guo, C. Wang, J. Lv, Y.-T. Tang, H. Yu, C. Snape, et al. 2021. A review on analysis methods, source identification, and cancer risk evaluation of atmospheric polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons. Sci. Total Environ. 789: 147741. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.147741

Fernie, K.J., S.C. Marteinson, D. Chen, A. Eng, T. Harner, J.E.G. Smits and C. Soos. 2018. Elevated exposure, uptake and accumulation of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons by nestling tree swallows (Tachycineta bicolor) through multiple exposure routes in active mining-related areas of the Athabasca oil sands region. Sci. Total Environ. 624: 250-261. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2017.12.123

 Gómez-Regalado, M.d.C., J. Martín, J.L. Santos, I. Aparicio, E. Alonso and A. Zafra-Gómez. 2023. Bioaccumulation/bioconcentration of pharmaceutical active compounds in aquatic organisms: Assessment and factors database. Sci. Total Environ. 861: 160638. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.160638

Goodchild, C. G., K. Grisham, J. B. Belden, and S. E. DuRant. 2020. Effects of sublethal application of Deepwater Horizon oil to bird eggs on embryonic heart and metabolic rate. Conserv. Biol. 34 (5):1262-1270. https://doi.org/10.1111/cobi.13539

Head, J. A., R. W. Jeffery, R. Farmahin, and S. W. Kennedy. 2015. Potency of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) for induction of ethoxyresorufin-O-deethylase (EROD) activity in hepatocyte cultures from chicken, Pekin duck, and greater scaup. Environ. Sci. Technol. 49 (6):3787-3794. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.est.5b00125

Honda, M. and N. Suzuki. 2020. Toxicities of Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons for Aquatic Animals. Int. J. Environ. Res. Public Health. 17: 1363. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17041363  

Kuo, D.T.F., B.A. Rattner, S.C. Marteinson, R. Letcher, K.J. Fernie, G. Treu, M. Deutsch, M.S. Johnson, S. Deglin and M. Embry. 2022. A Critical review of bioaccumulation and biotransformation of organic chemicals in birds. Rev. Environ. Contam. Toxicol. 260: 6. https://doi.org/10.1007/s44169-021-00007-1 

Ma, X. and S. Wu. 2024. Oxygenated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in food: toxicity, occurrence and potential sources. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutr. 64: 4882-4903.  https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2022.2146652

Mallah, M.A., L. Changxing, M.A. Mallah, S. Noreen, Y. Liu, M. Saeed, H. Xi, B. Ahmed, F. Feng, A.A. Mirjat, et al. 2022. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbon and its effects on human health: An overview. Chemosphere. 296: 133948. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2022.133948

Manousi, N., E.A. Deliyanni, E. Rosenberg and G.A. Zachariadis. 2021. Ultrasound-assisted magnetic solid-phase extraction of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and nitrated polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons from water samples with a magnetic polyaniline modified graphene oxide nanocomposite. J. Chromatography A. 1645: 462104. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chroma.2021.462104

Pei, Y., R. S. Halbrook, H. Li, and J. You. 2017. Homing pigeons as a biomonitor for atmospheric PAHs and PCBs in Guangzhou, a megacity in South China. Mar. Pollut. Bull. 124 (2):1048-1054. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.marpolbul.2016.10.059

Pereira, L. 2014. Persistent Organic Chemicals of Emerging Environmental Concern, in: Malik, A., Grohmann, E., Akhtar, R. (Eds.), Environmental Deterioration and Human Health: Natural and anthropogenic determinants. Springer Netherlands, Dordrecht, p. 163-213. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-007-7890-0_8

Pereira, M. G., L. A. Walker, J. Wright, J. Best, and R. F. Shore. 2008. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in eggs from gannets, golden eagles and merlins. Organohalogen Compounds. 70:166-169.

Pereira, M. G., L. A. Walker, J. Wright, J. Best, and R. F. Shore. 2009. Concentrations of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the eggs of predatory birds in Britain. Environ. Sci. Technol. 43 (23):9010-9015. https://doi.org/10.1021/es901805e

Patel, A.B., S. Shaikh, K.R. Jain, C. Desai and D. Madamwar. 2020. Polycyclic Aromatic Hydrocarbons: Sources, Toxicity, and Remediation Approaches. Front. Microbiol. 11:562813

Reizer, E., B. Viskolcz and B. Fiser. 2022. Formation and growth mechanisms of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons: A mini-review. Chemosphere. 291: 132793. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.132793

Sahoo, B.M., B.V.V. Ravi Kumar, B.K. Banik and P. Borah. 2020. Polyaromatic Hydrocarbons (PAHs): Structures, Synthesis and their Biological Profile. Current Organic Synthesis. 17: 625-640. https://doi.org/10.2174/1570179417666200713182441

Sekar, M., and T. R. Praveenkumar. 2024. Critical review on the formations and exposure of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) in the conventional hydrocarbon-based fuels: Prevention and control strategies. Chemosphere. 350: 141005. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2023.141005

Tartaglione, A.M., A. Racca and L. Ricceri. 2023. Developmental exposure to polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs): Focus on benzo[a]pyrene neurotoxicity. Rep. Toxicol. 119: 108394. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reprotox.2023.108394

Teixeira, J., C. Delerue-Matos, S. Morais and M. Oliveira. 2024. Environmental contamination with polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons and contribution from biomonitoring studies to the surveillance of global health. Environ. Sci. Pollut. Res. 31: 54339-54362. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-024-34727-3

Teunen, L., M. De Jonge, G. Malarvannan, A. Covaci, C. Belpaire, J.-F. Focant, R. Blust and L. Bervoets. 2021. Effect of abiotic factors and environmental concentrations on the bioaccumulation of persistent organic and inorganic compounds to freshwater fish and mussels. Sci. Total Environ. 799: 149448. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.149448

Tkachenko, H., N. Kurhaluk, T. Hetmański, A. Włodarkiewicz and V. Tomin. 2021. Changes in energetic metabolism and lysosomal destruction in the skeletal muscle and cardiac tissues of pigeons (Columba livia f. urbana) from urban areas of the northern Pomeranian region (Poland). Ecotoxicol. 30: 1170-1185. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10646-021-02423-4

Wang, J., H. Yuan, H. Wang, J. Wang, Y. Geng, Y. Zhang and Z. He. 2024. Enantioselective bioaccumulation, biotransformation and spatial distribution of chiral fungicide difenoconazole in earthworms (Eisenia fetida). Chemosphere. 361: 142404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2024.142404 

Wang, Y., A. Qi, P. Wang, X. Tuo, Q. Huang, Y. Zhang, P. Xu, T. Zhang, X. Zhang, T. Zhao, et al. 2022. Temporal profiles, source analysis, and health risk assessments of parent polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PPAHs) and their derivatives (NPAHs, OPAHs, ClPAHs, and BrPAHs) in PM2.5 and PM1.0 from the eastern coastal region of China: Urban coastal area versus coastal background area. Chemosphere. 292: 133341. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chemosphere.2021.133341

Wietzoreck, M., M. Kyprianou, B.A. Musa Bandowe, S. Celik, J.N. Crowley, F. Drewnick, P. Eger, N. Friedrich, M. Iakovides, P. Kukučka, et al. 2022. Polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons (PAHs) and their alkylated, nitrated and oxygenated derivatives in the atmosphere over the Mediterranean and Middle East seas. Atmos. Chem. Phys. 22: 8739-8766. https://doi.org/10.5194/acp-22-8739-2022

Xue, P., X. Liu, X. Shi, H. Yuan, J. Wang, J. Zhang and Z. He. 2023. Stereoselective accumulation and biotransformation of chiral fungicide epoxiconazole and oxidative stress, detoxification, and endogenous metabolic disturbance in earthworm (Eisenia fetida). Sci. Total Environ. 858: 159932. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.159932

Yebra-Pimentel, I., R. Fernández-González, E. Martínez-Carballo and J. Simal-Gándara. 2015. A critical review about the health risk assessment of PAHs and their metabolites in foods. Crit. Rev. Food Sci. Nutrit. 55: 1383-1405. https://doi.org/10.1080/10408398.2012.697497

Zhang, C., L. Barron and S. Sturzenbaum. 2021. The transportation, transformation and (bio)accumulation of pharmaceuticals in the terrestrial ecosystem. Sci. Total Environ. 781: 146684. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2021.146684

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *