Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits for Selection Criteria in Lentil

Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences (JEAS). Mahmood et al., 2019. Volume 19: 23-28

Open Access – Research Article

Assessment of Genetic Diversity and Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits for Selection Criteria in Lentil

Muhammad Tariq Mahmood1*, Mushtaq Ahmad1, Muhammad Shafiq2, Muhammad Saleem2, Amer Hussain2, Anwar-Ul-Haq2,  Muhammad Naeem Zafar3, Imtiaz Ali4

1Gram Breeding Research Station, Kallurkot, Pakistan
2Pulses Research Institute, AARI, Faisalabad, Pakistan
 3 College of Plant Science and Technology, Huazhong Agricultural University, Wuhan, China
4Regional Agricultural Research Institute, Bahawalpur, Pakistan


Abstract:
The present investigation was carried out at Gram Breeding Research Station, Kallurkot-Bhakkar, Pakistan, to determine a fruitful selection criteria for genetic improvement in lentil. Twelve elite lentil genotypes were grown under tri-replicate randomized complete block design (RCBD). Data were recorded for primary branches per plant, secondary branches per plant, pods per plant, plant height, days to 90 % maturity and grain yield. The recorded data were subjected to principal component analysis (PCA), path and correlation coefficient analysis. Analysis of variance revealed considerable variation among genotypes for all the recorded traits. PCA distinguished the traits into six PCs. First two components extracted more than 1 Eigen values and collectively contributed 79.86% in genetic variation. Higher positive loadings were extracted by secondary branches 1 and pods plant-1 in both components. Path analysis revealed that secondary branches plant-1 exhibited the highest direct positive effect (0.846) on grain yield followed by pods plant-1 (0.513). Correlation coefficient analysis also confirmed highest significant contributions of secondary branches plant-1 (92.0%) followed by pods plant-1 (76.0%) and primary branches plant-1 (65.0%). Study suggests that the secondary branches and pods plant-1 may be focused while determining fruitful selection criteria for genetic improvement in lentil.

Keywords: Yield traits, correlation, path analysis, PCA, lentil.
Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits, Genetic diversity and yield traits of lentil genotypes, Yield traits in lentil, Heritability and genetic advance in lentil breeding

*Corresponding author: Muhammad Tariq Mahmood: taqaisrani@gmail.com
  ________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits, Genetic diversity and yield traits of lentil genotypes, Yield traits in lentil, Heritability and genetic advance in lentil breeding


Cite this article as:

Mahmood, M.T.,  M. Ahmad,  M. Shafiq,  M. Saleem, A. Hussain and  A.U. Haq, M.N. Zafar, I. Ali, 2019. Assessment of genetic diversity and association analysis of yield contributory traits for selection criteria in lentil. Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sciences. 19:23-28.. [View Full-Text] [Citations]

 ________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits, Genetic diversity and yield traits of lentil genotypes, Yield traits in lentil, Heritability and genetic advance in lentil breeding

Copyright © Mahmood et al., 2019. This is an open-access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution License, which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium provided the original author and source are appropriately cited and credited.


Similar Articles Published in JEAS

  • Özkan, H., M. Aasim. 2020. Comparison of in vitro regeneration potential of different preconditioned and nonconditioned explants of peanut (Arachis hypogaea L). Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sciences. 22(2): 11-19. [Abstract] [Citations]
  • Akbarzai, D.K., G.R. Akbari, L. Mohammadi, M.N. Saif and A. Farhang. 2022. AMMI analysis of yield stability and adaptability in barley: A case study of Afghanistan. Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sciences. 24(1&2): 18-25. [Abstract] [View Full-Text] [Citations]
  • Nasir, M.W., and Z. Toth. 2021. Effect of drought stress on morphology, yield, and chlorophyll concentration of Hungarian potato genotypes. Journal of Environmental & Agricultural Sciences. 23(3&4): 8-16. [View Full-Text]  [Citations]
  • Ali, I., M.T. Mahmood, M.I. Akhtar, A. Zafar, A. M. Khan M. Zubair and W. Anum. 2019. Some direct and indirect selection indices for increased yield of peas (Pisum sativum L.).  Journal of Environmental& Agricultural Sciences. 21:23-28. [Abstract] [View Full-Text] [Citations]

________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits, Genetic diversity and yield traits of lentil genotypes, Yield traits in lentil, Heritability and genetic advance in lentil breeding .


1. Introduction

Lentil is an important rabi pulse crop grown for its grain. It belongs to family Leguminoceae with diploid chromosome number 2n = 14. It is cultivated in tropical, subtropical and temperate regions across the world (Roy et al., 2013; Nath et al., 2014; Pandey et al., 2015; Noor et al., 2017 and Sakthivel et al., 2019). Legumes are good source of nutrients including protein, carbohydrates and minerals (Dar et al., 2016; Muehlbauer et al., 1985 and Adsuleet al., 1989). Lentil is among the oldest domesticated grain legume crops (Bahl et al., 1993). In addition to nutrient source, lentil also provides various environmental and ecological benefits through biological N2 fixation (Adams et al., 2018; Khazaei et al., 2016; Chowdhury et al., 2019). Pakistan’s average lentil production (567 kg ha-1) is far below from the world’s average of 936 kg ha-1 (FAO, 2017). Major reason for decline in lentil production is scarcity of high yielding genotypes and narrow genetic base of cultivated genotypes (Roy et al., 2013; Khazaei et al., 2016 and Rizwan et al., 2017). Varieties in India and Pakistan are vulnerable to a wide range of environmental stresses due to their narrow genetic base (Erskine, 2009; Singh et al., 2014 and Noor et al., 2017).

Researchers seldom take interest in any single character, they also examine other characters and study their mutual relationships (Aghili et al., 2012; Benbrahim et al., 2017; Tejashwini et al., 2018). Various attributes are linked with each other for production of final phenotype (Admas et al., 2018; Mahmood et al., 2018; Mahpara et al., 2017). Higher yield being associated with various other attributes becomes complex in nature (Bakhsh et al., 1971; Saleem et al., 2002 and Yucel et al., 2006). Selection for higher grain yield may be easy when contribution of various attributes to yield is quantified through path coefficient analysis (Dewey and Lu, 1959).

Association analysis may be little more than an intelligent guess for determination of desired criteria for selection (Ahmad et al., 2017; Hawatin, 1978). Correlation coefficient and path analysis may be utilized for the selection of genotypes for future lentil breeding programme (Sakthivel et al., 2019). Correlation and path coefficient analysis have widely been employed by many researchers to examine the direct and indirect effects of different agronomic traits for genetic improvement in lentil (Karadavut, 2009; Aghili et al., 2012; Amin et al., 2015; Pandey et al., 2015 and Tejashwini et al., 2018).

Limited information on genetic variability and correlation among different yield contributory traits are available, so, it is very important to generate the information on the genetic diversity in lentil germplasms and also important to investigate the association among yield components. The present investigation was planned to generate information on genetic variability and association of different yield contributory traits to demonstrate a fruitful selection criteria for genetic improvement in lentil.


2. Materials and Methods

The experiment was carried out at Gram Breeding Research Sub-Station, Kallurkot (71.153oE and 32.923oN), Punjab, Pakistan, during rabi 2017-18. The experimental material consisting of 12 lentil (Lens culinaris) genotypes (LPP 16501, LPP 16502, LPP 16503, LPP16503, LPP 16504, LPP 16505, LPP 16506, LPP 16506, LPP 16507, LPP 16508, LPP 16509, LPP 16510, Markaz-09 and Pb-Masoor-09) was laid down into tri-replicate Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD). All entries were sown in 4 rows of 4 meter length. Row to row spacing was maintained at 20cm. All the agronomic practices were performed as per requirement of the crop.

Data were recorded for primary branches plant-1, secondary branches plant-1, pods plant-1, plant height (cm), days to 90% maturity and yield kg ha-1. Data were subjected to STAR (Statistical Tool for Agricultural Research version 2.0.1) for principal component analysis. Path analysis was done by the method presented by Dewey and Lu (1959) and correlation analysis was performed following Singh and Chaudhry (1979).

.


3. Results and Discussion

Results regarding mean performance of various yield contributory traits have been shown in Table (1). Maximum number of primary branches (2.83) were observed in Markaz-09 while minimum (1.60) were recorded in LPP 16502, maxim secondary branches (7) were recorded in LPP 16508 while minimum (3.67) were found in LPP 16509, Maximum number of pods plant-1 (45) were counted in LPP 16508 while minimum (20.67) were recorded in LPP 16509, maximum plant height (34.54) was measured in LPP 16501 while minimum (24.17) was measured in Pb- Masoor-09, most number of days to maturity (138) were recorded in LPP 16501 while less days (124.67) were recorded in LPP 16503, highest yield potential (434.67) was recorded in LPP 16508 while minimum yield (242.90) was found in LPP 16509. Basic analysis of variance revealed that all the genotypes were significantly different (p≥0.01) for all the traits under study (Table 2).

Principal component analysis employed for estimation of genetic variability distributed the traits into six PCs. A scree plot was also constructed for better illustration of results (Fig. 1). Eigen values expressed by PC1, PC2, PC3, PC4, PC5 and PC6 were 3.54, 1.25, 0.67, 0.35, 0.1547 and 0.0403 respectively. First and second components showed more than 1 Eigen values and exhibited 59.0% and 20.86% contribution in genetic variability with a cumulative share of 79.86% in total genetic diversity (Table 3). Similar results have also been reported by Shahid et al., 2002; Yucel et al., 2006; Benbrahim et al., 2017 and Idrissi et al., 2018 who reported more than 80% of genetic variation through first two components.

Performance of different traits in principle component analysis (Table 4) is evident that higher positive values of secondary branches plant-1 (0.517), number of pods plant-1 (0.499) were revealed in first component. PC2 also presented higher positive loadings for secondary branches plant-1 (0.6123) and number of pods plant-1 (0.4109) indicating that these traits share a considerable amount of genetic variation. These results are in line with earlier reports of (Khazaei et al., 2016; Laskar et al., 2017; Rizwan et al., 2017 and Sakthivel et al., 2019) who also reported secondary branches and number of pods share a notable amount of genetic variation.

Path coefficient studies were performed to quantify the direct effects of different traits to grain yield as shown in Table 5. Study revealed that highest significant direct effect on yield was presented by secondary branches plant-1 (0.846) followed by number of pods plant-1 (0.513) and plant height (0.275) while negative direct effect of days to maturity and primary branches plant-1 were observed. Positive direct effects of secondary branches and number of pods have also been reported by Yucel et al., 2006; Karadavut, 2009 and Amin et al., 2015. Path coefficient analysis suggested that secondary branches plant-1 and number of pods plant-1 may be considered as most effective agronomic traits contributing maximum towards final grain yield. Results agree with previous findings of Bakhsh et al., 1971 and Tejashwini et al., 2018.

Correlation coefficient analysis was performed to observe the association of different traits to grain yield as shown in (Table 6). Correlation analysis revealed that secondary branches plant-1 (0.921) presented highest positive contribution to grain yield followed by number of pods plant-1 (0.765), primary branches plant-1 (0.656) and plant height (0.252) to grain yield. It was also observed that days to maturity were negatively correlated to grain yield. Significant positive contributions to grain yield were exhibited by secondary branches plant-1 (92%) followed by number of pods plant-1 (76%) indicating that these traits are most influential for determination of grain yield. Similar results were reported earlier that secondary branches, number of pods and primary branches are major yield contributory attributes (Saleem et al., 2002 ; Yucel et al., 2006 and Aghili et al., 2012 ). Karadavut, 2009 and Amin et al., 2015 also concluded that number of pods and secondary branches plant-1 have higher significant and positive association with the final yield. Results are also in line with Chowdhury et al., (2019), who concluded that the number of primary branches plant-1 and number of pod plant-1 had positive and significant correlation as well as exhibit direct positive effect on seed yield plant-1.   


4. Conclusion

Principal component analysis extracted higher positive loadings for secondary branches plant-1 and pods plant-1 in both first and second component indicating that these traits have significant contributions towards genetic diversity. Path and correlation analysis revealed strong parallel association of secondary branches plant-1 and pods plant-1 in determination of grain yield. Therefore, the genotypes possessing higher numbers of secondary branches and pods plant-1 may be preferred while attempting lentil genetic improvement program.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits, Genetic diversity and yield traits of lentil genotypes, Yield traits in lentil, Heritability and genetic advance in lentil breeding


List of Abbreviations: RCBD, randomized complete block design; PCA, principle component analysis; N2, nitrogen; 2n, diploid chromosome number;  FAO, food and agriculture organization; Fig, Figure; PBPP, Primary branches plant-1; SBPP,secondary branches plant-1; NPP, number of pods plant-1; PH, plant height; DM, days to maturity; Yld, yield.

Competing Interest Statement: The authors declare that they have no competing interests regarding the publication of this paper.

Author’s Contribution: M.T.M., M.A. M.S. and I.A., involved in the conception, design of the study. M.T.M., A.H., A.U.H., M.S., M.N.M performed experiment; all authors were involved in data collection, analysis, interpretation and manuscript writing.

Acknowledgments: Authors are thankful to Pulses Research Institute (Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad, Pakistan) for their facilitation in conduction of research experiment and Journal of Environmental and Agricultural Sciences (JEAS) for their editorial services to make this manuscript valuable.

_______________________________________________________________________________________________________________
Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits, Genetic diversity and yield traits of lentil genotypes, Yield traits in lentil, Heritability and genetic advance in lentil breeding


References

Adams, M.A., N. Buchmann, J. Sprent, T.N. Buckley and T.L. Turnbull. 2018. Crops, nitrogen, water: are legumes friend, foe, or misunderstood ally? Trend. Plant Sci. 23(6): 539-550.

Admas, S., K. Tesfaye and T. Haileselassie. 2018. Application of advanced genomics for conservation and utilization of plant genetic resources. J. Environ. Agric. Sci. 17: 30-41.

Adsule, R.N., S.S. Kadam and H.K. Leung. 1989. Lentil. In: CRC hand book of world food legumes (eds. D.K. Salunkehe and S.S. Kadam). Boca Raton, Florida, USA: CRC Press.

Aghili, P., A.A. Imani,  S. Hossein and  A. Yousef. 2012. Study of correlation and relationships between seed yield and yield components in Lentil (Lens culinaris Medik). Ann. Biol. Res. 3(11): 5042-5045.

Agrawal, T., A. Kumar, S. Kumar, A. Kumar, R.R. Kumar, S. Kumar and P.K. Singh. 2018. Correlation and Path Coefficient Analysis for Grain Yield and Yield Components in Chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) under Normal and Late Sown Conditions of Bihar, India. Int. J. Curr. Microbiol. App. Sci. 7(2): 1633-1642.

Ahmad, F., A. Akram, K. Farman, T. Abbas, A. Bibi, S. Khalid and M. Waseem. 2017. Molecular markers and marker assisted plant breeding: current status and their applications in agricultural development. J. Environ. Agric. Sci. 11: 35-50.

Ahmad, F., M.M. Hanafi, M.A. Hakim,M.Y. Rafii, I.W. Arolu and S.N.A. Abdullah. 2015. Genetic divergence and heritability of 42 colored upland rice genotypes (Oryza sativa) as revealed by microsatellites marker and agro-morphological traits. Plos One 10: 1-18.

Amin, R., R.A. Laskar and  S. Khan. 2015. Assessment of genetic response and character association for yield and yield components in Lentil (Lens culinaris L.) population developed through chemical mutagenesis. Cogent Food Agric. 1(1): 2-15.

Bahl, P.N., S. Lal and B.M. Sharma. 1993. An overview of the production and problems in southeast Asia. p. 1-10. In: W. Erskine and M.C. Saxena (eds.), Lentil in South Asia. Proceedings of the seminar on lentils in south Asia. ICARDA, Aleppo, Syria.1-10.

Bakhsh, A., M. Zubair and A.Ghafoor.1991. Character correlation and path analysis in linetil. Pak. J. Agric. Res. 12(4): 246-251

Benbrahim, N., M.Taghouti, A. Zouahri and F. Gaboun. 2017. On-farm conservation of Zaer lentil landrace in context of climate change and improved varieties competition. Univ. J. Agric. Res. 5(1): 27–38..

Chowdhury, M.M., M.A. Haque,  M.A. Malek,M. Rasel  and K.U. Ahamed.. 2019. Genetic variability, correlation and path coefficient analysis for yield and yield components of selected lentil (Lens culinaris M.) genotypes. J. Bangladesh Agric. Uni.4(2): 769–776.

Dar, J.S., M.I.A. Rehmani, Z.A. Abbassi, A.G. Magsi. 2016. Effect of starter nitrogen on yield and yield components of chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.) at Dokri, Larkana. Pure and Applied Biology. 5(4): 1296-1303.

Dewey, D.R. and K.H. Lu. 1959. A correlation and path coefficient analysis ofcomponents of crescent wheat grass seed production. Agron. J. 51(9): 515-518.

Erskine, W. 2009. Global production, supply and demand. The Lentils: botany, production and uses. Preston, UK.p. 4-12.

Hawatin, G.C. 1978. Selection criteria in chickpeas, broad beans and lentils. Introduction to breeding food legumes. ICARDA, Aleppo. Syria. pp. 1-7.

Idrissi, O., A. Piergiovanni, F. Toklu, C. Houasli, S. Udupa, E. De Keyser and  J.  De Riek. 2018. Molecular variance and population structure of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) landraces from Mediterranean countries as revealed by simple sequence repeat DNA markers: Implications for conservation and use. Plant Genet. Resour. 16(3): 249-259.

Khazaei, H., C.T. Caron, M. Fedoruk,  M. Diapari, A. Vandenberg, C.J. Coyne,  R. McGee and K.E. Bett. 2016. Genetic diversity of cultivated lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) and its relation to the world’s agro-ecological zones. Front. Plant Sci. 7: 1093.

Laskar, R.A. and S. Khan.2017. Assessment on induced genetic variability and divergence in the  mutagenized lentil populations of microsperma and macrosperma cultivars developed using physical and chemical mutagenesis. PlosOne. 12(9): 1-18.

Mahmood, M.T., M. Ahmad, I. Ali, M. Hussain, A. Latif and M. Zubrair. 2018. Evaluation of chickpea genotypes for genetic diversity through multivariate analysis. J. Environ. Agric. Sci. 15: 11-17.

Mahpara, S., M.I.A. Rehmani, S. Hussain, J. Iqbal, M.K. Qureshi, M.A. Shehzad and J.S. Dar. 2017. Heterosis for some physio-morphological plant traits in spring wheat crosses. Pure Appl. Biol. 6(4): 1103-1110.

Muehlbauer, F.J., J.I. Cubero and R.J. Summerfield. 1985. Lentil (Lens culinaris Medic.). p. 266-311. In: R.J. Summerfield and E.H. Roberts (eds.), Grain Legume Crops. Collins, 8 Grafton Street, London, UK.

Mukhtar, M.S.,  M. Rahman and Y. Zafar. 2002.Assessment of genetic diversity among wheat (Triticum aestivum L.) cultivars from a range of localities across Pakistan using random amplified polymorphic DNA (RAPD) analysis. Euphytica. 128(3): 417–425.

Nath, U.K., S. Rani,M.R. Paul,M.N. Alam  and B. Horneburg. 2014. Selection of superior lentil (Lens esculenta M.) genotypes by assessing character association and genetic diversity.  Sci. World J.1–6. Noor, R., S.M. Khan,F. Ahmad,M. Hussain E.F. Abd_Allah,A.A. Alqarawi,A. Hashem and  A. Aldubise. 2017. The morpho-agronomic characterization study of Lens culinaris germplasm under salt marsh habitat in Swat, Pakistan. Saudi J. Biol. Sci. 24(7): 1639–1645.

Pandey, S., A. Bhatore and  A. Babbar. 2015. Studies on genetic variability, interrelationships association and path analysis in indigenous germplasm of Lentilin Madhya Pradesh, India. Electron.J. Plant Breed. 6(2): 592–599.

Rizwan, M., M. Aslam, M.J. Asghar, G. Abbas,T.M. Shah andH. Shimelis. 2017. Pre-breeding of lentil (Lens culinaris Medik.) for herbicide resistance through seed mutagenesis. Plos One. 12(2): 1-15.

Roy, S., M.A. Islam, A. Sarker, M.A. Malek,  M.Y. Rafii and  M.R. Ismail. 2013. Determination of genetic diversity in lentil germplasm based on quantitative traits. Aust. J. Crop Sci. 7(1): 1-14.

Sakthivel, G., S. Jeberson, N.B. Singh, P.R. Sharma, S. Kumar, V.K. Jalaj, B. Sinha and N.O. Singh. 2019. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis in lentil germplasm. Pharma Innov.  8(6): 417-420.

Saleem, M., K.Shahzad, M. Javid and S.A.Rauf. 2002. Heritability estimates for grain yield and quality characters in chickpea (Cicer arientinum L.).  Int. J. Agric. Biol. 4(2): 275-276.

Singh, R.K. and B.D. Chaudhry. 1979. Biometrical methods in quantitative genetic analysis. Kalyani Publ., New Delhi, India. p. 304.

Singh, M., I.S. Bisht,  S. Kumar, M. Dutta, K.C. Bansal, M. Karale, A. Sarker, A. Amri, S. Kumar and S.K. Datta. 2014. Global wild annual lens collection: a potential resource for lentil genetic base broadening and yield enhancement. Plos One. 9(9): 1-18.

Yadav, G.C., P.K. Singh, B.B. Singh and R. Verma. 2001. Genetic variability and Path coefficients in urdbean. Indian J. Pulses Res. 14(2): 143-144.

Yucel, D.O., A.E. Anlarsal and C. Yucel. 2006. Genetic variability, correlation and path analysis of yield, and yield components in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Turk. J. Agric. 30: 183-188.


Assessment of Genetic Diversity, Association Analysis of Yield Contributory Traits, Genetic diversity and yield traits of lentil genotypes, Yield traits in lentil, Heritability and genetic advance in lentil breeding

 

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *